Review of Editing Modernity: Women and Little-Magazine Cultures in Canada, 1916-1956, by Dean Irvine (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2008) 320 pps. Cloth, End Notes, Works Cited, Indexed.

 

In a critical “Introduction”, the author compares a radical avant-gardism (often codified as “masculine”) and a mass culture often depicted as “sentimental, feminine and regressive.”  He describes the “little” magazine as “a type of non-commercial literary, arts, or cultural-interest periodical.”  He rejects Dudek’s “restrictive” definition, with its emphasis on the “literary” and the masculine.

 

Irvine offers an “eccentric” focus on women’s fugitive poems, short-lived magazines, and little-known print cultures; archives, marginalia, and ephemera; manuscripts, typescripts, correspondence, and other archival documents, as well as poems, letters, editorials, articles, reviews and advertisements.

 

Within international circles of modernism, women played a large role, among them were: Harriet Monroe and Alice Corbin Henderson (Poetry); Margaret Anderson and Jane Heap (the Little Review);   Marianne Moore (the Dial); Katherine Mansfield (Rhythm, the Blue Review, and the Signature); H.D. and Bryher (Close-up)

 

Irvine seeks to recover women editors who were not themselves poets (or primarily poets).  In addition, he deals with women poets who were also editors of little magazines and/or members of little magazine groups.  Thus, Canadian women magazine editors and poets represent a “doubly marginalized” group in relation to international literary cultures.  Women have remained peripheral to historical narratives of the little magazine in Canada.

 

In Chapter 1, “Invitation to Silence: Toronto, Montreal, Vancouver, 1932-1937”, Irvine offers histories of the Cultural Left: “Among Masses: Livesay and Leftist Magazine Culture”; New Frontier’s Popular Front”; the “Left in Crisis”.  On New Frontier’s staff, women were a majority, its founder Jean Watts, and two of the four editors (Dorothy Livesay and Margaret Gould).

 

In Chapter 2, “Marginal Modernisms: Victoria, Vancouver, Ottawa 1935-1953”, he surveys: “Canadian Poetry Magazine, (1936-63), the CAA, and Contemporary Verse”; “Modernism Our Enemy? Marriott and ‘Magazine Verse’”; “A People’s Modernism: Livesay’s Contemporary Verse”; and “After Contemporary Verse”.  The periodical Contemporary Verse was founded by Livesay, Marriott, Doris Ferne, and Floris McLaren, and edited by Alan Crawley.

 

In Chapter 3, “Gendered Modernisms: Montreal, Toronto, Vancouver 1941-1956”, he attempts to deal with: “Gender and Little-Magazine Cultures”; Page’s Preview (1942-5); “Waddington’s First Statement” (1942-5); “Page, Waddington, and Their Contemporary Verse” (1941-52)  Female contributors to First Statement (including Page, Waddington, and Kay Smith) were subjected to gender-specific attacks.

 

 

In Chapter 4, “Editing Women: The Making of Little Magazine Cultures, 1916-1947”, he reports on the pre-Massey Commission: “Flora MacDonald Denison and the Sunset of Bon Echo” (1916-20); in the 1930s, “Feminism on the Left: Florence Custance and the Woman Worker” (1926-9); “Paper Kingdom in the Queen City: Mary Davidson and the Twentieth Century” (1932-3);  Hilda and Laura Ridley of the Crucible (1932-43), “In the Making: The Ridleys and the Crucible”; “Taking Care of Business: Eleanor Godfrey and the Canadian Forum” (1935-47).

 

In Chapter 5, “Guardians of the Avant-garde: Modernism, Anti-Modernism, and the Massey Commission”, he considers “Commissioning the Avant-Garde”, with “Her Yellow Book: Catherine Harmon (with Paul Arthur) and here and now” (1947-9); “Making Her Impression: Myra Lazecho-Haas’s New Canadianism” (1950-1); “Art in Small Print: Yvonne Agazarian and pm magazine” (1951-2) ; “’Not a one man job’: Aileen Collins and CIV/n” (1953-5); “A People’s Culture: Margaret Fairley and New Frontiers (1952-6).

 

 In the Conclusion, we find “In Transition”; “A Putting Down of Roots’: Livesay and CV/II”; “1957 and After” Of course, the Canadian feminist literary periodicals of the 1970ss and 1980s are fundamentally different, with a radical shift after 1957.  There is a sharp decline in the number of women editing little magazines, after 1957.

 

Of note is the fact that New Frontier (1936-7) was published in the 1930s and New Frontiers (1952-6) was published in the 1950s.

 

According to Irvine, who has unlocked our literary history, at least as it pertains to women little magazine publishers, “Chief among the stumbling blocks encountered by women little-magazine editors were the economic obstacles related to the cost of magazine production and distribution, which usually signaled the end of a given magazine’s existence.”

 

Economic difficulties persisted, when either private funds or public grants marked (and ensured?) continued funding for non-commercial magazines, after 1957

 

Some important sources Irvine mentions are: Norman Levine, “We All Begin in a Little Magazine,” Thin Ice (Ottawa: Deneau and Greenberg, 1979, pp. 38-47); .The Making of Modern Poetry in Canada: Essential Articles on Contemporary Canadian Poetry in English, by Louis Dudek and Michael Gnarowski (Toronto: Ryerson, 1967), a seminal resource which contains “The Role of Little Magazines in Canada”, (pp. 205-12); Frederick Hoffman, Charles Allen, and Carolyn F. Ulrich’s The Little Magazine A History and a Bibliography (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1946); Mark S. Morrisson, The Public Face of Modernism: Little Magazines, Audiences, and Reception, 1905-1920 (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 2001)

 

There has been a project of exposing “masculinist” editorial practices and recovering histories of women’s editorial labour in the context of little magazines.  It is a fact that women little-magazine editors have fared “poorly” in Canadian literary history.  Of particular note, P.K. Page, Dorothy Livesay, Anne Marriott and Miriam Waddington, in their dual roles, enjoyed long careers as poets.  In addition, they responded to and recovered from the “poetic crises” of their little-magazine years in different ways. Women poets who contributed to leftist and modernist little magazines have, of course, fared “much better” in literary history than those who did not.  A problem is the “scarcity” of archival documents related to women little-magazine editors.  Another is their uncollected poetry.

 

Irvine relies on Jayne E. Marek’s Women Editing Modernism: “Little” Magazines and Literary History (Lexington: University Press of Kentucky, 1995).  He concludes, from David McKnight’s bibliography, of those little magazines founded between 1941 and 1956, 11 of 23 (47 percent) had at least one woman editor; for those little magazines established between 1957 and 1980), the ratio decreases to 65 of 177 (36 percent). He deals, to some extent, with the “transition” of magazines, from little magazines founded and/or edited by women in Canada, to the feminist literary magazine.   Another fact is that, after 1957, as the number of little magazines in Canada increased dramatically, the percentage of women editors affiliated with these magazines actually dropped (based on both funded and unfunded magazines.)

 

Hence, the pre-decade remains one of the “most productive” periods for women editors of Canadian little magazines.   Then, editors of feminist literary magazines took collective action “during a period of men’s ascendancy if only in number in Canadian little-magazine culture”, after 1957.  There needs to be a history of Canadian little magazines in the 1970s and 80s.   Women were writing “for women”.   Livesay’s CV/II, founded in 1975, was a literary magazine edited by a woman and soliciting women’s writing (but, not yet, a feminist literary magazine).  See: CV2’s transition, from Livesay’s editorship (1975-7) to its first women’s editorial collective (1984- ).  Irvine compares the historical connections between the feminist literary magazine and the little magazines founded and/or edited by women in Canada.

. 

Regarding to: the continuation of literary, arts and cultural magazines, from the pre-Council era, only Quarry was “ever edited” by a woman, though not “until Gail Fox took over the editorship in 1976”; she was succeeded by Bronwen Wallace (1978-81.)

 

Irvine thanks P.K. Page for answering his queries, in conversation and in a letter (9 August 2000), about her roles in the physical production of Preview. Of a predecessor to Preview, “Peggy had typed it…and [Anderson] wrote the content and ran off copies”, (in note 2, p. 287).  Anderson remarks, in a 1945 letter to A.J. M. Smith, “I feel quite bitter about Preview’s attitude to Peggy.  She spent hours and hours mimeographing the magazine carrying paper etc. and actually called most of the meetings. She never got a word of thanks.”(note 4, p. 287.) Page was critical of Contemporary Verse in Preview, but, in a letter to Alan Crawley, she offered a “private retraction”.  Her letter of resignation, to John Sutherland, from Northern Review, was published in the October-November 1947 issue. (note 26, p. 291-2) Her comment, in a September, 1949 letter to Sybil Hutchison, observes, ironically, of “The ‘little magazines.’  Nothing in the world could sound more pitiful to the uninitiated than that term.” (p. viii)

 

In “Works Cited”, there are “Archival Sources” and “Published and Other Sources”. A shorter version of Chapter 10 “Among Masses: Dorothy Livesay and English Canadian Leftist Magazine Culture of the Early 1930s” appeared in the “Materializing Canada Issue” of Essays on Canadian Writing 68 (1999), pp. 183-212.  A longer version of the second section of the conclusion appeared in the Dorothy Livesay special issue “Dorothy Livesay’s Perspectives, Retrospectives, and Prospectives: ‘A Putting Down of Roots’ in CVII,’” Contemporary Verse 2, 21.3 (1999), pp. 65-78.

 

This is a volume in the Studies in Book and Print Culture, Series Editor: Leslie Howsam.    Irvine, an Associate Professor in the Department of English at Dalhousie University, is also the author of The Canadian Modernists Meet (University of Ottawa Press, 2005) in their Reappraisals: Canadian Writers Series.

 

Another title in the Studies in Book and Print Culture is New Canadian Library: The Ross-McClelland Years, 1952-1978, by Janet B. Friskney, (University of Toronto Press, 2007).  An Appendix with “New Canadian Library Titles, 1958-1978” is provided.  Appendix B covers copies of “NCL Titles Sold Annually, 1958-1979”.   As well, Appendix C has “Titles Proposed but Not Included in the NCL to 1978”.  A complementary text is “Publishing by Women”, by Carole Gerson, “Publishing For Distinct Readerships: Publishing And Communities”, in History of The Book In Canada, Volume Three, 1918-1980 (University of Toronto Press, 2007, pp. 318- 322).  While women participated in the material production of print, from 1918-1980, they were proportionally fewer as identified by imprint.  Those who were visible, did so in relation to woman-specific topics or though books for children.  Much “rarer” has been the woman-controlled publishing house.  In general terms, publishing books was more stable than periodicals.  There is Table 13.1 “Labour in the Book Trade: Divisions by Sector, Occupation, and Gender in the Printing Trades in Selected Canadian Cities, 1921-1961” (pp. 364-5) to reinforce this inevitable conclusion.

 

Irvine does not deal with the “menial” jobs women undertook, not always acknowledged in the masthead; most of the non-editorial tasks were clerical in nature, although he admits these too have been marginalized as female-gendered labour in the masculinist little-magazine historiography.

 

When I taught a course in Canadian Literature while a post-graduate student at the University of Ottawa, in the 1970s, our text was Canadian Anthology, Selected and edited by Carl F. Klinck and Reginald E. Watters (Toronto, Gage Educational Publishing Limited).  Klinck was the editor of the Literary History of Canada and Watters compiled A Checklist of Canadian Literature.  While the majority of authors represented in the course survey were males, which nobody questioned, when I taught contemporary authors, Margaret Atwood, Margaret Laurence, Alice Munro, I was asked why there were more women than male authors on the book-titles prospectus.  My reply was that I was surprised at being asked why there were more books by females listed, because it was not a conscious choice.  Rather, the predominant contemporary fiction writers just happened to be women.

 

The same complaint was received when I published the first issue of The Prairie Journal of Canadian Literature, (Fall 1983).  I had selected submissions by Dorothy Speak, “Crinolines”; Ann Knight, “Roadsongs”; Genni Gunn, “The Writer” and “The Artist”; Ilona Marchaelle, “Promises, Promises”and “Happy Anniversary”; Pat Allan, “Death- Then & Now”; and  Jean E. Veevers, “Prairie Born”.  There were reviews of The Moment Is All:  Selected Poems 1944-83, by Ralph Gustafson; Dig Up My Heart: Selected Poems 1952-83, by Milton Acorn, and Just Off Main, by Gary Hyland.  However, the contributors (myself included) were female and it was cause for complaint.

 

I marginally attended the League annual general meeting in Saskatoon.  I was “with child” and/or the child was with me, so I was constantly interrupted, by another biological imperative. When I truly came “into” the League of Canadian Poets, (or they came into me) it was attendance at the 1987 “Illegitimate Positions: Women & Language” panel, an experience that opened doors for me.  It was presented May 8, 1987, at Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario.  The Feminist Caucus, with Cathy Ford, Sue McMaster, Erin Mouré, Penn Kemp, Patience Wheatley, Neile Graham, and others welcomed me.  The Living Archives Series became my life-line, when I transcribed their enlightening observations from an oral tape recording.  The Caucus Committee Chairs have come and gone.  I volunteered (or was volunteered) to serve as Chair. Needless to add, I have stayed.   I have contributed to four chapbook panels, on Memory, on Reviews, on Belles Lettres, and another on Erotics.  With the anticipated acquisition of the Feminist Caucus papers, in 2009, by the National Archives in Ottawa, at least this portion of literary history will reap rewards for future scholars.

 

                                                 

Anne Burke