The other morning, after I managed to start
up my computer, I noticed this file
named ``ReadFirs.doc.''
(A friend had e-mailed me a whole bunch of files a while
back.) Hmmm, I
rubbed my face. I sat and stared. Then, I thought to myself-- hey!-
maybe the answer, my friend, is not blowing in the
wind. The answer is not part of
some vast cosmic oneness.
But instead, it's been hiding in the firs, in the forest's
trees! Yes, I
thought, the answer's not in the whole.
The answer's in the firs, in
reading the individual firs, in the trees not the forest. In the parts, the details, the
microcosms-- not the whole. And as sunlight slanted through my window, revealing
suspended dust motes, glinting off my computer screen, it
occurred to me that, hey!
maybe oneness has been overrated. Maybe unity holds less energy. Maybe the sum
of the parts is greater than the whole. I thought of quantum mechanics, of the bits
that
make up atoms-- photons and muons and quarks, zipping and
dipping and loose. And
how, when these bits join together, energy gets
released. Hey!-- the parts must
then
hold more energy, individually, than the whole, so of
course, compared to the whole
forest, the individual firs must also hold more--